- An analysis
of financial market history shows there has been an inverse relationship
between the relative performance of growth stocks and value
stocks. Though long term returns for growth stocks and value
stocks have been comparable, over short to intermediate periods of
time each of the two groups has relatively outperformed or underperformed
the other, sometimes dramatically so.
- The graph
below clearly illustrates the phenomenon of clear and sustained outperformance
by either growth or value styles of management..
Growth
Managers and Value Managers
vs. Total Equity Database*
- Given the tendency
for growth and value styles to be in or out of favor
for multi-year periods, we believe a blended growth
and value approach is more likely to achieve the
consistency we believe
our clients seek than either style as a stand-alone strategy.
- We believe
a broadly diversified blend of large capitalization domestic and
foreign domiciled stocks, well selected from both the growth
and value sectors and intensively managed within
a single portfolio, will produce consistently
superior results and reduced volatility relative to either a growth-only
or value-only approach.
- Having a wide
range of thoroughly researched choices within both the growth
and value sectors also provides the flexibility to
identify attractive equities at any point in the inevitable market
cycle.
- For taxable
clients, our low turnover approach, averaging less than 20% per
annum, supports our effort to manage toward high after-tax
returns.
- Stock returns
must compete successfully against bond yields.
- The performance
benchmark for our equity portfolios is the Standard and Poor's 500
Stock Index.
*
Represents the annual percentile ranking of the Large Growth Median
and Large Value Median vs. the Large Domestic Equity manager universe
in the Effron-PSN database. This universe consists of over 1000 equity
products.
|